3.27.2008

The Angola 3's Wallace and Woodfox Out of Solitary!!

By DOUG SIMPSON
The Associated Press

BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — Two former Black Panthers held in solitary confinement in a Louisiana prison since the 1970s have been transferred into quarters with other inmates, state corrections officials said Wednesday.

Herman Wallace and Albert Woodfox were moved from solitary into a "maximum security dormitory" on Monday, said Angie Norwood, assistant warden at the Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola. Wallace and Woodfox had been in solitary since 1972, after their convictions in the death of a guard.

The men, known to supporters as the "Angola Three," have said their 36 years of solitary confinement at the prison amount to cruel and unusual punishment. Both are appealing their convictions.

Wallace and Woodfox were in the news last week because U.S. Rep. John Conyers, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, visited them and the Michigan Democrat announced he's learned of evidence proving they were wrongly convicted.

Louisiana prison officials said the men's transfers were unrelated to Conyers' visit and statements — even though they had said for years that Wallace and Woodfox were in solitary for their own protection.

The two inmates were among 19 prisoners moved under a new policy aimed at freeing up solitary space by transferring solitary prisoners with records of good behavior into the high-security dorms, corrections officials said.

"Inmates were being evaluated who might qualify for the maximum custody dormitories, inmates with good records who might warrant a move, and (Wallace and Woodfox) were part of that group," Norwood said.

Nick Trenticosta, Wallace's lawyer, did not immediately return a call for comment.

Robert King, the other of the Angola Three group, had his conviction for killing another inmate overturned. He was released in 2001 after 29 years in solitary confinement. King formerly used the surname Wilkerson.
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Share/Save/Bookmark

3.18.2008

Turn the Tide for the Angola 3

Dear Friends,

Jim Crow justice in Louisiana has kept Herman Wallace and Albert Woodfox locked in solitary confinement for a crime everyone knows they didn't commit.
Despite overwhelming evidence of their innocence, the "Angola 3", spend 23 hours each day in a 6x9 cell on the site of a former plantation. Prison officials - and the state officials who could intervene - won't end the terrible sentence. They've locked them up and thrown away the key because they challenged a system that deals an uneven hand based on the color of one's skin and tortures those who assert their humanity.

We can help turn things around by making it a political liability for the authorities at Angola to continue the racist status quo, and by forcing federal and state authorities to intervene. I've signed on with ColorOfChange.org to demand an investigation into this clear case of unequal justice. Will you join us?


When ColorOfChange.org spoke up about the Jena 6, it was about more than helping six Black youth in a small town called Jena. It was about standing up against a system of unequal justice that deals an uneven hand based on the color of one's skin. That broken system is at work again and ColorOfChange.org is joining The Innocence Project and Amnesty International to challenge it in the case of the Angola 3.

"Angola", sits on 18,000 acres of former plantation land in Louisiana and is estimated to be one of the largest prisons in the United States. Angola's history is telling: once considered one of the most violent, racially segregated prison in America, almost a prisoner a day was stabbed, shot or raped. Prisoners were often put in inhumane extreme punishment camps for small infractions. The Angola 3 - Herman, Albert and Robert - organized hunger and work strikes within the prison in the 70's to protest continued segregation, corruption and horrific abuse facing the largely Black prisoner population.

Shortly after they spoke out, the Angola 3 were convicted of murdering a prison guard by an all-white jury. It is now clear that these men were framed to silence their peaceful revolt against inhumane treatment. Since then, they have spent every day for 35 years in 6x9 foot cells for a crime they didn't commit.
Herman and Albert are not saints. They are the first to admit they've committed crimes. But, everyone agrees that their debts to society for various robbery convictions were paid long ago.

NBC News/Dateline just aired a piece this week about the plight of the Angola 3. And it's time to finally get some justice for Herman and Albert. For far too long, court officials have stalled and refused to review their cases. Evidence of prosecutorial misconduct and constitutional violations have not swayed them.
It's now time for the Governor of Louisiana and the United States Congress, which provides the funding for federal prisons like Angola, to step in and say enough is enough. Please join us in calling for Governor Bobby Jindal and your Congressperson to initiate an immediate and full investigation into the case of the Angola 3.

Thanks.

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Share/Save/Bookmark

3.13.2008

Drunk Enough to Say I Love You (cont.)

I just saw Drunk Enough to Say I Love You at The Public Theater.


Hey, Mikey, I liked it. Mostly because the performers -- Samuel West as Guy and Scott Cohen as Sam. They both were very charming, even when speaking about the darkest subjects of life.


Caryl Churchill has written a very smart play here. It doesn't hit you in the gut or anything but it does knock on your frontal lobe.


But hey, at 45 minutes, it's a good time.



Posted from my iPod

Labels: , ,

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Share/Save/Bookmark

Drunk Enough to Say I Love You

Indeed ... More to come

Posted from my iPod

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Share/Save/Bookmark

3.11.2008

Dread Scott: Welcome to America



I know the Eliot Spitzer scandal has got all the buzz, but there are far better news organizations and political commentators out there than I to focus on the matter, so I'm going to take the opportunity to talk about some art here. Actually, I'm going to talk about the censorship movement against the artist Dread Scott's exhibition Welcome to America.


Welcome to America is currently showing at MoCADA, and it's controversial. I remember hearing about the controversy on television news programs, and then this morning I received an email about the artist being vilified in the press for his vision. I'll never understand why people want to censor artistic vision because of political beliefs -- but it's been happening since the beginning of time. What's so controversial about Dread Scott's work this time (because, you know, he does have a history of provocative work)? The Blue Wall of Violence, which is part of the larger exhibition.


The Blue Wall of Violence — a work that focuses on police brutality — prompted the police union to call for the city and state to defund the museum. Does police brutality not exist? Is that what the police union is saying by protesting the whole exhibition, which, by the way, also includes work about people left to suffer and die in Katrina, people killed by the US war on Afghanistan, brutality against Muslims while in detention after 9/11. Oh, the irony of the police union forming a wall around this exhibition with its knee-jerk reaction to the concept. I don't understand what the union is hoping for ... are people never supposed to comment on the violence committed by some police officers. Notice I said, "some" and not "all." Artists are supposed to speak for the people who can't speak for themselves.


Dread Scott has noted that "The world is a horror for billions of people and I want my audience to engage this when they see my art as well as dream of how it could be radically different." And on the recent controversy he commented "What kind of society have you got when the police not only have unrestrained power to shoot unarmed people but then demand that artists and museums that shine the light on these crimes be punished for it?"

For those of you in New York City, you should take a trip out to MoCADA on Thursday evening (March 13, 2008, 7:00-9:00pm) for a town hall/artist talk with Dread Scott. The artist will discuss the work in the show and the controversy that is surrounding it. The audience will walk through the exhibition during the talk and Dread will discuss the works in detail. Beyond the stimulating dialog, MoCADA needs your support now. Please come and join the conversation. Reservations can be made through email at info [at] mocada.org or by calling (718) 230-0492.

Labels: , , , , ,

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Share/Save/Bookmark

3.05.2008

Montreal

Here are some photos I took on a recent trip to Montreal. As to their bagels, which are supposed to rival New York's ... sorry, Montreal ... non, non, et non!





Labels: , , ,

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Share/Save/Bookmark

3.04.2008

National Grammar Day



Today is the day to mind your Ps and Qs! It's National Grammar Day! The Society for the Promotion of Good Grammar and MSN Encarta have designated March 4, 2008, as National Grammar Day. It's a great opportunity to get back in touch with your inner Strunk & White.


So what can you do today to celebrate?


  • Visit Grammar Girl for a quick refresher course on grammar. I also like to listen to her podcasts on the regular. She answers all the grammar questions you can think of. (And, yes, it's ok to end with a preposition!

  • While you're visiting websites, check out this very funny blog about one of my pet peeves: unnecessary quotation marks. The site is aptly named The “Blog” of “Unnecessary” Quotation Marks.

  • Go through your local paper for examples of GOOD GRAMMAR and send kudos to the editor. Positive reinforcement!

  • Spread the word!


There are more helpful hints on the National Grammar Day site at nationalgrammarday.com. Enjoy!

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Share/Save/Bookmark

3.03.2008

Seeking Mr. 38?



I'm a words woman. I love 'em anyway you want to give them to me: clean and proper; blue; with lots of trills and thrills; with a lilt in your voice or a guttural boom. That said, I like numbers too. I even read the biography of zero once. I especially like numbers when they start bumping into my love life.


I was walking around a bookstore (see aforementioned love of words), and I came across this book tossed into the cheap bin. It was Chance by Amir D. Aczel. Scanning the list of contents, I spied a chapter about finding the best apartment, pet, or spouse. I was intrigued.


In my world, where magic and love at first sight most certainly do exist, applying probability theory to romance seemed absurd. But I'd heard about probability theory on that wacky show Numb3rs (Judd Hirsch!), so I read on. According to Aczel — I'm summarizing here — good men (apartments, cute pets) are hard to find. And when they are found, people want to grab them up immediately. So, how does one gauge if they've grabbed up the right specimen? Mathematics!


Aczel's theory goes a little something like this:


You will maximize your probability of finding the best spouse if you date about 37 percent of the available candidates in your life and then choose to stay with the next candidate who is better than all the previous ones.


What does that mean? Well, I'll apply the theory to my own life. Let's say I only think I'll meet 10 men in my life whom I would consider marrying. And at this rate, 10 is a good number. Then, according to the theory, I should marry eligible man number five, assuming that he's better than the four (I've rounded up from 3.7) who came before him. If you think you're going to meet 100 suitable mates, then you've got to endure 37 contenders before you marry the next one to come along — again, that's presuming Number 38 is better than the previous 37.


Is the theorem perfect? No. But it's probably as good as any other dating plans ... for instance, swinging a dead cat.


Carry on.

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!
Share/Save/Bookmark